Skip to content

CLDSRV-887: ListMultipartUploads return checksum algo and type#6147

Merged
bert-e merged 4 commits intodevelopment/9.4from
improvement/CLDSRV-887-list-mpus-return-checksum
Apr 14, 2026
Merged

CLDSRV-887: ListMultipartUploads return checksum algo and type#6147
bert-e merged 4 commits intodevelopment/9.4from
improvement/CLDSRV-887-list-mpus-return-checksum

Conversation

@leif-scality
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@leif-scality leif-scality commented Apr 10, 2026 •
edited
Loading

ListMultipartUploads return checksum algo and type if set by the user in CreateMultipartUpload

@leif-scality leif-scality force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-883-create-mpu-handle-checksum branch from 68227d0 to ba8eaae Compare April 10, 2026 09:55
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 10, 2026 •
edited
Loading

❌ 1 Tests Failed:

Tests completed Failed Passed Skipped
8760 1 8759 0
View the top 1 failed test(s) by shortest run time 
"before each" hook for "should retrieve a part that overwrote another part originally copied from an MPU"::GET object With v4 signature With PartNumber field uploadPartCopy overwrite "before each" hook for "should retrieve a part that overwrote another part originally copied from an MPU"
Stack Traces | 6.22s run time 
Connection timed out after 5000 ms

To view more test analytics, go to the Test Analytics Dashboard
📋 Got 3 mins? Take this short survey to help us improve Test Analytics.

@leif-scality leif-scality force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-887-list-mpus-return-checksum branch from 8df1003 to 936d53c Compare April 10, 2026 09:58
@leif-scality leif-scality marked this pull request as ready for review April 10, 2026 10:02
@leif-scality leif-scality force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-887-list-mpus-return-checksum branch 2 times, most recently from 9b51509 to c03667b Compare April 13, 2026 15:45
Base automatically changed from improvement/CLDSRV-883-create-mpu-handle-checksum to development/9.4 April 14, 2026 14:13
@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Apr 14, 2026

Hello leif-scality,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval ⭐
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status ⭐
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA ⭐
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix ⭐
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check ⭐
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval ⭐
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval ⭐
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Apr 14, 2026

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue CLDSRV-887 contains:

  • None

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 9.4.0

Please check the Fix Version/s of CLDSRV-887, or the target
branch of this pull request.

@leif-scality leif-scality force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-887-list-mpus-return-checksum branch from c03667b to 313d7ea Compare April 14, 2026 14:25
@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Apr 14, 2026

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • 2 peers

@claude
Copy link
Copy Markdown

claude bot commented Apr 14, 2026

LGTM

Review by Claude Code

@leif-scality
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

leif-scality commented Apr 14, 2026

/approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Apr 14, 2026

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/9.4

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8
  • development/9.0
  • development/9.1
  • development/9.2
  • development/9.3

Please check the status of the associated issue CLDSRV-887.

Goodbye leif-scality.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e bert-e merged commit 313d7ea into development/9.4 Apr 14, 2026
54 of 57 checks passed
@bert-e bert-e deleted the improvement/CLDSRV-887-list-mpus-return-checksum branch April 14, 2026 15:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@anurag4DSB anurag4DSB anurag4DSB approved these changes

@BourgoisMickael BourgoisMickael BourgoisMickael approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@leif-scality @bert-e @anurag4DSB @BourgoisMickael